TL;DR: Closed Milestone 0 and Milestone 1 by stabilizing the project foundations and delivering a clean, code-only core asset model with disciplined CRUD helpers.
Project: /projects/assettrack
AssetTrack exists to solve a very specific problem: reliable, offline-first asset accountability without accidental complexity. Before building workflows, reports, or operator interfaces, the project needed a solid footing.
Milestone 0 was about getting the ground right. Milestone 1 was about defining and operating on the thing that matters most: the asset itself.
Both milestones were intentionally unglamorous. That was the point.
Milestone 0 focused on making the repo boring in the best way:
compileallBy the end of Milestone 0, the project had a stable baseline with no ambiguity about how it should grow.
Milestone 1 defined what an “asset” actually is in AssetTrack — and just as importantly, what it is not.
Key decisions:
asset_tag is the globally unique identifier and primary scan targetissued_to) is separate from condition and accountabilityFrom there, the milestone delivered:
create_assetget_asset_by_tagupdate_assetretire_assetNo UI. No audit engine. No legacy wiring. Just predictable data access with tight boundaries.
Two things stood out during this work.
First, pausing early and often prevents architectural debt. Several times, the right move was to stop, smoke test, and confirm assumptions before continuing. That discipline paid off.
Second, small commits matter. Treating each helper as its own completed slice made the work easier to reason about and easier to review later. It also kept the PRs honest.
This milestone reinforced that moving deliberately is often the fastest way to move forward.
With the core asset model complete, AssetTrack can finally move up the stack.
Milestone 2 will introduce:
The foundation is stable. Now the system can start doing real work — carefully.